
Designing Better Buttons: Consistency, Hierarchy & Buttons vs Links
Hey, welcome back!
After a comprehensive look into some of the most common UX psychology principles, today weāre kicking off a series on one of the simplest elements (or so they say) in any UIābuttons.
Now, you might think, āWhatās there to discuss about buttons?”.
But trust me, thereās so much more beneath the surface.
Designing an effective button requires a wealth of UX knowledge.
How do we decide how it should look? š
Where should we place it? š
What copy should it have? š
How do we differentiate an action button from a destructive one? š
And when is having too many buttons on one screen simply an overkill? š
These are the fascinating questions I love to mull over when designing buttons.
If youāre someone who enjoys dissecting things, understanding why we do what we do, and discovering how to make things just perfect, youāre in for a treat.
In this series, Iāll answer all these questions in depth.
But today, letās start with the basics.
Whatās Inside:
- Consistency and Recognisability
- Establishing Visual Hierarchy (Primary vs. Secondary Actions)
- Differentiating Buttons from Links
Buttons might seem like minor UI elements, but trust me, there’s more to it than meets the eye.
Designing effective buttons requires careful thought.
Every critical actionāfrom purchasing a product and submitting a form to navigating to the next stepārelies on buttons.
Research shows that improving button design can significantly boost overall usability and even conversion rates.
There was one famous case study involving a large retailer that revamped a confusing āRegisterā button into a clearer āContinueā button, allowing purchases without forced registration.
The result was an annual revenue increase of $300 million!
Itās a great reminder that effective button design isnāt just about aesthetics but itās closely linked to cognitive psychology, user trust, and business outcomes.
So, today, weāll dive into how to maintain visual consistency in button design, establish a hierarchy of actions, and properly distinguish buttons from links.
And, of course, weāll reflect on why these details matter.
Consistency and Recognisability
Users rely on visual signifiers.
If a button doesnāt look like a button, people might simply miss it or hesitate to click.
In the current trend towards minimalist, āflatā design, many interfaces have stripped away traditional signifiers like shadows, outlines, or gradients.
But this approach doesn’t always work.
In fact, research by the Nielsen Norman Group shows that overly flat designs can suffer from ālost signifiers,ā leaving users uncertain about whether something is clickable or not.
On top of that, some of the eye-tracking studies indicated that UIs with weak visual cues demand more effort from users and draw less attention than those with clear 3D-style buttons or underlined links.
So, to ensure your buttons are recognisable, make them look like buttons: ā¬ļø
- Use consistent styling across your product: colours, shapes, shadows, or outlines, to signal that an element is interactive.
- Avoid styling buttons as plain text or mixing them in with static content.
- As a handy rule of thumb: never treat static text and interactive text the same way visually. For example, if your primary buttons share a unique colour, make sure that colour isnāt used in the background, where it might blend in.
In terms of visual contrast, a button should stand out from its surroundings, having strong contrast in colour and brightness.
This not only signals its interactivity but also meets accessibility guidelines…
š Continue reading on Medium
š Read on Substack
This space thrives because of YOU. ā¤ļø
If the resources I share help you grow, a small contribution from you could keep this community strong.
Together, weāre building a space to learn, grow, and support each other.
Every bit helps, and by supporting me, you’re directly helping keep this space alive and growing.ā¤ļøā¬ļø
Or simply scan this QR code ā¬ļø

Your support means a lot!
You might also like:
Sources:
- Button Design: Best Practices for Optimal UI Buttons ā Baymard Institute
- The $300 Million Button ā UX Articles by Center Centre
- Don Norman’s Seven Fundamental Design Principles | UX Collective
- Flat-Design Best Practices – Nielsen Norman Group
- THE HIPPER ELEMENT ā Flat UI Elements Attract Less Attention and Cause
- Designing for Action: Best Practices for Effective Buttons by Balsamiq
- Understanding Success Criterion 2.5.5: Target Size by WAI – W3C
- Links VS Buttons: A Perennial Problem ⢠DigitalA11Y
- Better Link Labels: 4Ss for Encouraging Clicks by NNG
- Ghost Buttons ā Not as Bad as We Thought? – Medium
- Image credit: Buttons vs Links UX Movement
Share this article: